Much has been said about Professor Richard Dawkins' recent words on the subject of fairy stories.
“Is it a good thing to go along with the fantasies of childhood,
magical as they are?" he said. "Or should we be fostering a spirit
of scepticism?...
“Even fairy tales, the ones we all
love, with wizards, or princesses turning into frogs or whatever it was.
There’s a very interesting reason why a princess could not turn into a frog –
it’s statistically too improbable.”
(May I just point out here that if a thing
is statistically improbable it actually means that it can happen, not
that it can't?)
Still, Professor Dawkins words were produced in the heat of a moment so we can't expect them to have been very
carefully considered.
His later tweet, though, in
response to the uproar, really should have been:
“Might foster
supernaturalism. On balance more likely to help critical thinking.”
And he's right, stories about
wizards might help critical thinking.
The essential thing about fairy stories, though, is that they're about people (even if
sometimes they're dressed up as frogs, giants or witches).
And people? They do all sorts of
things for all sorts of reasons and non-reasons, and one of the most
important things to bear in mind is that logic and critical thinking may not
get you anywhere near understanding any of it.
But, you know something?
A fairy
tale just might.
Word To Use Today: dawk. This is a
Northern English dialect word for a hand.
|
Yes, exactly....the fantastical stuff is just decor...the stories are about real people and sometimes very nasty things they do to one another. But the good Prof is apparently now saying fairy tales are okay!
ReplyDeleteIs he? Good for him for thinking it is possible that he may be wrong.
Delete